Tags. REAL published claim · REAL (project) Grant archive · SPECULATIVE lean/mnemonic · OPEN not re-checked · REJECTED do not use
Writing-system terms
-
Morphography REAL
Orthographic units primarily represent morphemes, arranged to match morphological structure (Joyce 2011). “One graph ≈ one morpheme” is a good default, not a universal law.
-
Morphophonic REAL
Graphs primarily represent sound, only secondarily morphemes (DeFrancis–Matsunaga line via Honda). Honda’s unified model routes graphs through phonological exponents of morphemes, covering both sides.
-
Ideography (myth) REJECTED
The claim that characters encode meanings without language. Mainstream linguistics rejects this (DeFrancis–Unger Critique; Lurie 2006; Honda 2019). Do not treat kanji as a parallel semantic system that bypasses syntax.
-
On / kun REAL
On (音): historically Chinese-derived (Sino-Japanese) readings. Kun (訓): native Japanese words mapped by meaning. Same graph can package different lexical strata. Readings are spell-out routes — not argument slots.
-
Jukujikun REAL
Idiomatic kun over a multi-graph string (e.g. 田舎 ‘countryside’) that is not the sum of regular readings of each graph.
-
SP / xíngshēng compound REAL
Historical formation class: semantic radical + phonetic element. In modern Japanese, phonetic elements cue on imperfectly and do not cue kun (Honda).
-
Okurigana REAL
Kana suffix spelling inflection after a kanji stem. Productive tense/aspect/politeness lives in kana — evidence that kanji ≠ Infl.
-
Ateji / on’yaku REAL
Phonetic or irregular character uses (e.g. 葡萄 ‘grapes’) where graphs do not contribute live morpheme composition.
Valency / packaging terms
-
Lexical arity REAL
How many arguments a predicate’s lexical entry licenses.
-
Surface arity REAL (project)
How many distinguished participant phrases appear in the clause. Can diverge from lexical arity and from deep event geometry.
-
Event geometry REAL (project)
Underlying participant structure (e.g. Agent–Theme–Goal). Project slogan: a four-place sentence is still one geometry plus one packaging.
-
Packaging REAL (project)
How Case, Appl, MeasureP, light verbs, movement, and related devices realize the same geometry with different surface arities. Morphology is one of the places packaging freezes.
-
MeasureP / Cl / Nume REAL
Extended-nominal functional structure for numeral + classifier. Amount ≠ Denomination. Counters are inert for verbal valency (Watanabe 2006; Oho 2019; project MeasureP notes).
-
Light vs heavy suru REAL
Light suru assigns Acc and inflection but no θ-roles; process nominals (VNs) supply the θ-grid. Heavy suru ≈ agentive main do with θ-opaque objects (Grimshaw & Mester 1988).
-
Argument Transfer REAL
θ-role redistribution from the Noun’s list into light suru’s argument structure. Surface clause arity ≠ arity on VN alone ≠ arity on suru alone.
-
Fossil vs live packaging SPECULATIVE as Givón lean
Live: productive Appl, light-verb transfer, floating Num+Cl. Fossil: opaque compounds, bleached historical morphology. Givón’s “today’s morphology is yesterday’s syntax” frames fossils — labeled lean, not theorem.
Anti-glossary — rejected
Do not say
- Kanji doping — no joint literature; forbidden invention.
- Radical as dopant — materials metaphor, not linguistics.
- Readings as arity — on/kun are spell-out routes, not argument counts.
- Kanji as Merge/Agree — graphs are not syntactic heads.
- Ideographic composition — meaning-without-language myth.
Say instead
- Kanji as orthographic correlate of stems, counters, VNs.
- Classifiers / MeasureP as nominal packaging.
- VN + light suru as Argument Transfer.
- Opaque compounds as scalar lexical opacity (Honda).
- Bridge unlocked — no doping claims from this desk.
Rejected. No kanji↔doping joint field. Doping’s linguistic partner elsewhere is θ-roles / Navajo — not orthography.